Office Hours: 8:00am - 12:00pm & 1:00pm-4:30pm Monday through Friday

Precision Agriculture Survey Results

precision farming

KEY FINDINGS

BOW RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT- PRECISION AGRICULTURE SURVEY

Dr. Lorraine Nicol and Dr. Christopher Nicol, University of Lethbridge January 2020

  • Number of survey participants: 101 or 15.5% of district irrigators
  • Percentage who have adopted precision agriculture technologies – 82%
  • Average number of technologies adopted – 4.7
  • Satisfaction rating of technologies (‘somewhat positive’ or ‘extremely positive’) – 87%
  • Top five technologies adopted (percentage of adopters):
    • Using auto-steer (92%)
    • Establishing field boundaries, low spots, unfarmable land (49%)
    • Studying/analysing yield data (49%)
    • Using satellite imagery (42%)
    • Yield mapping (42%)
  • Effects (annual averages):
    • Reduction in irrigation water (21%)
    • Increase in crop quality (20%)
    • Increase in crop yield (18%)
    • Reduction in fertilizer (15%)
    • Reduction in herbicides (15%)
    • Reduction in pesticides (13%)
  • Top motivators for adopting:
    • To reduce energy costs (67%)
    • To reduce labour hours (67%)
    • To reduce machine time (64%)
    • To increase annual crop yield (60%)
    • To increase annual crop quality (56%)
    • To reduce annual irrigation water (51%)
  • Future adoption intentions: 82% plan further adoption in the next five years
  • Type of land precision agriculture applied to - irrigated 70%, dry-land 30%
  • Crop most benefitting from precision agriculture (percentage of adopters):
    • Speciality Crops (48%)
    • Cereals (7%)
    • Oil Seeds (43%)
    • Forages (2%)
  • Non-adopters - main reasons for not adopting:
    • Operation is too small (31%)
    • High investment costs (23%)
  • Non-adopters who plan to adopt in the next five years – 19%